As a professional, I must call out a recent Financial Times article on “crypto treasury companies” (specifically those holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets, or “BTC”).
https://www.ft.com/content/478ea5bc-ea18-44f7-9da1-602ebe283fca（CLIC)
The piece is deeply problematic.
A publication that claims to be a “neutral” financial journal shouldn’t just list past events.
It should offer a clear, evidence-based prediction.
What value is there in an article that simply rehashes what has already happened, presenting two sides without an incisive perspective?
Let’s break down exactly why this article misses the mark.
